Connect with us

2nd Amendment

Defend Your Gun Rights: Getting Involved In Second Amendment Advocacy

a pistol and rifle with the constitution booklet on the American flag

If you’re like a lot of gun owners in this country, you’re deeply concerned about the constant and recurring attacks on the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court has handed down some landmark decisions that have buoyed the spirits of gun owners and Second Amendment advocates from coast to coast. 

However, the actions of gun grabbers in the legislature continue to raise concerns. Nebulous attacks on “assault rifles” and “ghost guns” continue, with the Biden Administration promising to pass a ban similar to the one President Biden was instrumental in passing in the early 1990s. Congressional gun grabbers keep at their game of leveraging every tragic mass shooting into a call for strict control on guns, up to and including a total ban on private firearms ownership.

VNSH Holster

This leaves many firearms enthusiasts and Second Amendment advocates wanting to get involved in defending the right to keep and bear arms. Getting started is the hardest part and it can be difficult to know where to begin. So we’ve put together a helpful list for you to figure. 

Offer Your Money To Worthy Causes

When I say “gun rights” the first thing that you think of is the NRA. Now the NRA aren’t bad – they certainly do more good than harm. On the other hand, there are much more committed Second Amendment groups who don’t have the same high profile as the NRA who desperately need your money. 

Here are some lesser-known organizations that are worth your money: 

  • Firearms Policy Coalition: The FPC focuses primarily on litigation and is a no-nonsense Second Amendment absolutist group. All gun control laws infringe on the Second Amendment, so the FPC fights gun control laws in the courts while also educating the grass roots on how to make their voices known to their elected officials. 
  • Gun Owners Of America: The Gun Owners of America are such a threat to gun grabbers that Michael Moore lampooned them in his film Bowling For Columbine. The group was founded by Second Amendment advocates who thought the NRA was too soft on gun control. Unlike FPC, GOA focuses on lobbying Congress for meaningful protection of the Second Amendment.
  • Second Amendment Foundation: For every big, high-profile Second Amendment case in the courts there are hundreds of incredibly unsexy lawsuits and criminal cases that need litigating to protect your right to keep and bear arms. This is where the Second Amendment Foundation focuses the bulk of its efforts – these little-known cases that can have a big impact on the Second Amendment landscape in America.

Think about where you want to focus your money the most and start making regular donations – or even better, consider donating to all three. 

Find Your Local Representatives

People become far too focused on the Presidential elections when really, it’s the down ballot races that matter even more. This begins at the local level. 

It’s not enough to follow Presidential politics. You should know your local, state and federal representatives. So start with a quick Google search to find out who is representing you in your town, city or county, then move up to the state level and finally your representatives in Washington, DC. 

VNSH Holster

Once you know who they are, it’s important to communicate with them. It’s easy to be cynical about elected government officials and think that they don’t care what we think. However, think about it this way: How are your elected representatives supposed to know how you want – and indeed, expect – them to vote if you’re not making your voice heard. 

So after you find out who your representatives are, call or write their office and let them respectfully know that you’re a Second Amendment voter and expect them to vote in favor of a robust Second Amendment. 

Write Your Local Newspaper

Hard to believe, but newspapers still exist and people still read them. So writing a letter into your local newspaper about local gun issues impacting where you live is a great way to inform people of the issues.

The best kind of letter is one that picks one specific argument against gun control and sticks to the facts. An appeal to emotion can be a strong closer once you have laid out the bare facts to your readers, but tugging at their heart strings before they’re convinced is a sure way to convince absolutely no one. 

Because newspapers are local, you’ll want to stick to issues in your town, city, county or state. Even if you don’t convince someone to switch sides, you might convince them to get off their butt and go to the polls when it matters.

For the more technologically inclined, consider starting your own blog or writing for one of the hundreds of pro-Second Amendment websites already out there. 

Join Rallies and Protests

Rallies aren’t just for gun grabbers and their toadies. There are rallies in favor of the Second Amendment as well. 

VNSH Holster

These are a great way for people who don’t have any money to spare and aren’t the most persuasive writers to get more involved in hands on way. The best part is, all you really need to be is a warm body. Bringing more people with you is a great way to multiply your impact. 

Fighting for the Second Amendment isn’t just for paid lobbyists, Congressmen and lawyers. Average, every day Americans can and should get involved in defending our most precious freedom against the clutches of gun grabbers. 

*This article contains 3rd party affiliate offers*

(Visited 46 times, 1 visits today)

2nd Amendment

Supreme Court’s Ruling on Bump Stocks Sparks Debate Over Second Amendment

us-supreme-court-gavel-on-book

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a federal ban on bump stocks, Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy expressed concerns that the high court is preparing to fundamentally alter the interpretation of the Second Amendment. Speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Murphy warned that recent gun-related rulings suggest the court might restrict Congress’s ability to implement measures such as background checks or bans on specific firearms like AR-15s.

Murphy’s comments come after the Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate the federal ban on bump stocks, devices that enable a semi-automatic rifle to fire at a rate similar to a fully automatic weapon. This ruling represents another instance of the conservative-majority court rolling back firearm regulations.

The ban on bump stocks was initially pushed by former President Donald Trump following the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas, where a gunman used the devices to kill 58 people at an outdoor music festival. A Texas gun store owner challenged the ban after surrendering two bump stocks to the government, eventually suing to reclaim them.

Murphy criticized the Supreme Court’s ruling, suggesting that it aligns with broader efforts to erode gun control measures. He argued that the decision undermines previous bipartisan support for the bump stock ban and positions the court to dismantle key components of gun regulation, thus jeopardizing community safety.

The ruling has sparked a divide between gun control advocates and supporters of gun rights. Gun control groups contend that the court’s decision will exacerbate gun violence in a country already plagued by frequent shootings. They argue that the ban was a necessary regulation to prevent high-casualty incidents facilitated by rapid-fire capabilities.

Conversely, many Republicans have praised the court’s decision, maintaining that the bump stock ban was unconstitutional from the outset. GOP Sen. Tom Cotton remarked that the ban approached an infringement on the Second Amendment and emphasized the need to focus on tackling violent and gang-related crime rather than restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens.

The Supreme Court’s decision, although not based directly on the Second Amendment, has brought the debate over gun rights back to the forefront. This ruling is part of a trend where the high court has sided with gun rights groups, reflecting a broader judicial philosophy that may limit legislative and executive efforts to regulate firearms.

Despite the contentious ruling, Murphy highlighted some positive trends, noting a decline in urban gun homicide rates. He emphasized the ongoing need for effective legislation to prevent tragedies like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting while acknowledging recent legislative changes that he believes have contributed to enhanced public safety.

As the nation grapples with the implications of this decision, the divide between those advocating for stricter gun control and those championing gun rights continues to shape the legal and political landscape surrounding the Second Amendment.

What do you think of the recent Supreme Court ruling?

Continue Reading

2nd Amendment

Hunter Biden Conviction Raises Second Amendment Questions Amidst Political Tensions

syktyvkar-komi-republic-russia-november-26

Hunter Biden’s recent conviction on federal gun charges has sparked a unique convergence of political and constitutional debates, with Second Amendment advocacy groups criticizing the law used to secure the conviction. Despite their staunch opposition to President Biden’s gun control policies, these groups are not necessarily rallying to Hunter Biden’s defense but are highlighting broader concerns about firearm regulations.

The case centers around Hunter Biden’s October 2018 purchase of a firearm from StarQuest Shooters & Survival Supply in Wilmington, Delaware. Prosecutors argued that Biden lied on ATF Form 4473 when he denied being an unlawful user of or addicted to controlled substances, a claim contradicted by his struggle with drug addiction at the time. After a weeklong trial, the jury found him guilty on all counts.

Gun Owners of America (GOA), a leading pro-Second Amendment organization, criticized the federal firearm regulation under which Biden was convicted. While they believe the law is “unconstitutionally broad,” they also assert that Hunter Biden deserved no special treatment and should face the same legal consequences as any other citizen.

The trial included emotional testimonies from Biden’s family members, emphasizing his ongoing battle with addiction. Despite the sympathy his personal struggles may evoke, the evidence presented by the prosecution was deemed overwhelming, leading to a swift jury verdict.

Mike McCoy, a former federal prosecutor and Second Amendment attorney noted the effectiveness of the prosecution’s case and suggested that most gun owners, given the current administration’s stance on gun control, might not be particularly concerned about this specific conviction. He acknowledged the broader implications of the ruling for the Second Amendment community.

In an unexpected twist, the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has offered to assist Hunter Biden in challenging his conviction on constitutional grounds. The FPC argues that federal gun regulations are often unconstitutional and detrimental to individual freedoms, and they have expressed their willingness to support Biden in contesting these laws.

The political ramifications of the conviction are significant, particularly given President Biden’s aggressive stance on gun control. Critics argue that the administration’s policies are inconsistent, pointing to the conviction of the president’s son as evidence of this hypocrisy. President Biden, however, has maintained his support for stricter gun regulations, calling on Congress to ban bump stocks and “assault” weapons in the wake of the ruling.

Hunter Biden faces a maximum prison sentence of 25 years for his three charges, along with substantial fines and supervised release. As a first-time offender, he is unlikely to receive the maximum penalties, but the case underscores the complex interplay between personal accountability, legal interpretations, and political agendas in the ongoing debate over gun rights in America.

The situation illustrates the intricate and often contentious nature of firearm regulations and Second Amendment rights, highlighting the need for careful consideration and balanced legislation in addressing these critical issues.

Was Hunter Biden rightly convicted? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

2nd Amendment

Supreme Court Ruling on Bump Stocks: A Victory for Second Amendment Advocates

usa-national-flag-waving-wind-front

The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a significant victory for Second Amendment supporters, ruling that a bump stock does not transform a firearm into an automatic weapon. This decision strikes down a federal rule that banned bump stocks, affirming the right of Americans to own such devices.

In a 6-3 decision, Justice Clarence Thomas clarified the court’s stance on the issue. He emphasized that Congress has long restricted access to “machineguns,” defined as firearms capable of “shooting automatically more than one shot by a single function of the trigger.” Semiautomatic firearms, which require the shooter to reengage the trigger for each shot, do not fall under this category. The court concluded that a bump stock, which allows for rapid reengagement of the trigger, does not convert a semiautomatic rifle into a machine gun.

The case, Garland v. Cargill, questioned whether a bump stock device qualifies as a machinegun under federal law, given its design to increase the firing rate of a rifle. The Supreme Court’s majority opinion found that a semiautomatic rifle with a bump stock does not fire more than one shot per trigger pull and therefore cannot be classified as a machinegun. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) had exceeded its statutory authority by classifying bump stocks as such.

This ruling follows a contentious history. In the wake of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, which left 60 people dead and 500 wounded, the ATF issued an interpretive rule categorizing bump stocks as machine guns. This decision was met with substantial political pressure and led to a nationwide ban initiated by the Trump administration and defended by President Biden’s Justice Department.

The Supreme Court’s decision has been met with mixed reactions. Gun rights advocates, like Michael Cargill, owner of Central Texas Gun Works, view it as a reaffirmation of constitutional rights. Cargill, an Army veteran, sued the government after being forced to surrender his bump stocks under the ATF’s rule. His legal team praised the ruling, arguing that the ATF overstepped its authority by attempting to rewrite criminal laws without congressional action.

Critics of the decision, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor, argue that it undermines public safety. Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson in dissent, contended that a bump-stock-equipped semiautomatic rifle essentially functions as a machinegun and should be regulated accordingly. President Biden also criticized the ruling, calling on Congress to ban bump stocks and “assault” weapons to prevent mass shootings.

The ruling has far-reaching implications for gun owners and the firearms industry. Bump stocks, which first appeared in the early 2000s, allow for a higher rate of fire by harnessing the recoil energy of a semiautomatic weapon. The Supreme Court’s decision means that the estimated half a million bump stocks in circulation before the federal ban can now be lawfully owned and used.

For Second Amendment advocates, this ruling is a critical affirmation of the right to bear arms and a rejection of regulatory overreach. It underscores the importance of adhering to the constitutional framework when interpreting laws related to firearms. As debates over gun control continue, the Supreme Court’s decision will undoubtedly influence future legislative and judicial actions concerning the Second Amendment.

The battle over bump stocks highlights the ongoing tension between gun rights and gun control efforts. While the Supreme Court has clarified the legal status of these devices, the broader debate over firearm regulations and Second Amendment rights is far from settled. As the nation grapples with issues of public safety and constitutional freedoms, this ruling serves as a reminder of the complex and often contentious nature of gun policy in America.

Was the Supreme Court right on bump stocks? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Guncountry. All Rights Reserved