Connect with us

2nd Amendment

Defend Your Gun Rights: Getting Involved In Second Amendment Advocacy

a pistol and rifle with the constitution booklet on the American flag

If you’re like a lot of gun owners in this country, you’re deeply concerned about the constant and recurring attacks on the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court has handed down some landmark decisions that have buoyed the spirits of gun owners and Second Amendment advocates from coast to coast. 

However, the actions of gun grabbers in the legislature continue to raise concerns. Nebulous attacks on “assault rifles” and “ghost guns” continue, with the Biden Administration promising to pass a ban similar to the one President Biden was instrumental in passing in the early 1990s. Congressional gun grabbers keep at their game of leveraging every tragic mass shooting into a call for strict control on guns, up to and including a total ban on private firearms ownership.

VNSH Holster

This leaves many firearms enthusiasts and Second Amendment advocates wanting to get involved in defending the right to keep and bear arms. Getting started is the hardest part and it can be difficult to know where to begin. So we’ve put together a helpful list for you to figure. 

Offer Your Money To Worthy Causes

When I say “gun rights” the first thing that you think of is the NRA. Now the NRA aren’t bad – they certainly do more good than harm. On the other hand, there are much more committed Second Amendment groups who don’t have the same high profile as the NRA who desperately need your money. 

Here are some lesser-known organizations that are worth your money: 

  • Firearms Policy Coalition: The FPC focuses primarily on litigation and is a no-nonsense Second Amendment absolutist group. All gun control laws infringe on the Second Amendment, so the FPC fights gun control laws in the courts while also educating the grass roots on how to make their voices known to their elected officials. 
  • Gun Owners Of America: The Gun Owners of America are such a threat to gun grabbers that Michael Moore lampooned them in his film Bowling For Columbine. The group was founded by Second Amendment advocates who thought the NRA was too soft on gun control. Unlike FPC, GOA focuses on lobbying Congress for meaningful protection of the Second Amendment.
  • Second Amendment Foundation: For every big, high-profile Second Amendment case in the courts there are hundreds of incredibly unsexy lawsuits and criminal cases that need litigating to protect your right to keep and bear arms. This is where the Second Amendment Foundation focuses the bulk of its efforts – these little-known cases that can have a big impact on the Second Amendment landscape in America.

Think about where you want to focus your money the most and start making regular donations – or even better, consider donating to all three. 

Find Your Local Representatives

People become far too focused on the Presidential elections when really, it’s the down ballot races that matter even more. This begins at the local level. 

It’s not enough to follow Presidential politics. You should know your local, state and federal representatives. So start with a quick Google search to find out who is representing you in your town, city or county, then move up to the state level and finally your representatives in Washington, DC. 

VNSH Holster

Once you know who they are, it’s important to communicate with them. It’s easy to be cynical about elected government officials and think that they don’t care what we think. However, think about it this way: How are your elected representatives supposed to know how you want – and indeed, expect – them to vote if you’re not making your voice heard. 

So after you find out who your representatives are, call or write their office and let them respectfully know that you’re a Second Amendment voter and expect them to vote in favor of a robust Second Amendment. 

Write Your Local Newspaper

Hard to believe, but newspapers still exist and people still read them. So writing a letter into your local newspaper about local gun issues impacting where you live is a great way to inform people of the issues.

The best kind of letter is one that picks one specific argument against gun control and sticks to the facts. An appeal to emotion can be a strong closer once you have laid out the bare facts to your readers, but tugging at their heart strings before they’re convinced is a sure way to convince absolutely no one. 

Because newspapers are local, you’ll want to stick to issues in your town, city, county or state. Even if you don’t convince someone to switch sides, you might convince them to get off their butt and go to the polls when it matters.

For the more technologically inclined, consider starting your own blog or writing for one of the hundreds of pro-Second Amendment websites already out there. 

Join Rallies and Protests

Rallies aren’t just for gun grabbers and their toadies. There are rallies in favor of the Second Amendment as well. 

VNSH Holster

These are a great way for people who don’t have any money to spare and aren’t the most persuasive writers to get more involved in hands on way. The best part is, all you really need to be is a warm body. Bringing more people with you is a great way to multiply your impact. 

Fighting for the Second Amendment isn’t just for paid lobbyists, Congressmen and lawyers. Average, every day Americans can and should get involved in defending our most precious freedom against the clutches of gun grabbers. 

*This article contains 3rd party affiliate offers*

(Visited 46 times, 1 visits today)

2nd Amendment

Forces of Freedom Push Back Against National Red Flag Laws

hand-gun-on-red-background-man

The upcoming visit of Vice President Kamala Harris to Florida isn’t just a routine affair; it’s a strategic move to promote yet another assault on our constitutional rights by the Biden administration. The so-called National Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) Resource Center, presented as a tool to prevent violence, is actually a thinly veiled attack on the Second Amendment. Let’s delve into why conservative voices and Republicans are vehemently opposing this Orwellian initiative.

A Closer Look at ERPOs: A Conservative Stand for Freedom

Under the guise of preventing harm, ERPOs grant authorities the power to strip individuals of their firearms based on vague and subjective criteria. Modeled after domestic violence protection orders, these laws trample on the rights of law-abiding citizens, eroding the very foundation of our freedoms.

Erosion of Due Process: A Fundamental Concern for Conservatives

At the heart of conservative values lies a steadfast commitment to due process and the rule of law. ERPOs flagrantly disregard these principles, allowing for the seizure of firearms based on mere allegations, often without the opportunity for the accused to defend themselves in court. This erosion of due process sets a dangerous precedent that conservatives cannot abide by.

Targeting Law-Abiding Citizens: Conservative Opposition

Despite claims of targeting individuals deemed a threat, ERPOs have the potential to be weaponized against law-abiding citizens. By exploiting vague criteria and subjective judgments, authorities can effectively disarm individuals without just cause, infringing upon their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Conservatives recognize this blatant overreach and refuse to stand idly by as their rights are trampled upon.

A Federal Overreach: Conservative Concerns

Conservatives staunchly oppose the creation of the National ERPO Resource Center as a blatant overreach of federal authority. This centralized bureaucracy threatens to undermine the sovereignty of states and the rights of their citizens. Conservatives believe in the principles of limited government and federalism, and they refuse to allow the federal government to dictate firearm policies that should be left to the states and local communities.

Resistance from the Right: Conservative Leaders Speak Out

Republican leaders have been at the forefront of the opposition to this Orwellian initiative. Voices like Reps. Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene have sounded the alarm, urging Americans to resist this assault on their freedoms. Conservatives across the country are uniting to defend the Second Amendment and push back against the Biden administration’s agenda.

Conservatives understand that the true path to safety lies not in surrendering our rights but in upholding the principles of liberty and justice for all. The Biden administration’s relentless pursuit of gun control measures is an affront to these principles, and conservatives will continue to stand united against any encroachment on our freedoms. It’s time to reaffirm our commitment to the Constitution and reject any attempts to erode our Second Amendment rights.

What do you think of the push for national red flag laws? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Continue Reading

2nd Amendment

Federal Judge Rules Second Amendment Protects Gun Rights of Illegals

court-law-trial-session-honorable-female

In a groundbreaking decision, U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman of Illinois has ruled that the Constitution extends Second Amendment protections to illegal aliens who enter the United States illegally. The ruling comes in response to a case involving defendant Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, challenging a federal prohibition on illegal aliens owning firearms.

Constitutional Protection for Second Amendment Rights

Judge Coleman’s ruling, delivered on Friday, asserts that while there exists a federal ban on illegal immigrants possessing firearms, this prohibition is unconstitutional as applied to Carbajal-Flores. Despite the federal law being deemed “facially constitutional,” the court found that there is no historical basis for firearm regulation that justifies denying Second Amendment rights to noncitizens who have not been convicted of violent crimes.

Judge Coleman stated that the statute violates the Second Amendment. Consequently, the court granted Carbajal-Flores’ motion to dismiss the charges against him.

Legal Precedent and Constitutional Interpretation

In reaching her decision, Judge Coleman referenced the landmark Supreme Court ruling on Second Amendment rights, emphasizing the absence of a historical tradition allowing the government to deprive noncitizens of their constitutional right to bear arms. This interpretation underscores the fundamental principle that the Second Amendment applies not only to citizens but also to noncitizens residing within the United States.

Implications and Future Proceedings

The ruling by Judge Coleman carries significant implications for the legal landscape surrounding gun rights and immigration. By affirming that the Second Amendment protects the rights of non-citizens, the decision challenges existing federal laws and sets a precedent for future cases involving similar circumstances.

Moving forward, the decision is likely to spark debates and legal challenges regarding the intersection of immigration status and constitutional rights. As the case progresses, it will be closely monitored by legal experts, advocacy groups, and policymakers alike, shaping the ongoing discourse on gun rights and immigration policies in the United States.

Conclusion

Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman’s ruling represents a significant development in the ongoing debate over Second Amendment rights and immigration laws. By affirming that noncitizens, including those who enter the country illegally, are entitled to constitutional protections, the decision highlights the importance of upholding fundamental rights regardless of citizenship status. As the legal proceedings continue, the implications of this ruling will reverberate throughout the legal and political spheres, shaping future policies and interpretations concerning gun rights and immigration in the United States.

What do you think of the federal court’s ruling? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Continue Reading

2nd Amendment

South Carolina Embraces Permitless Carry: Strengthening Second Amendment Rights

south-carolina-flag-us-state-gun

In a resounding affirmation of Second Amendment principles, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster has signed permitless carry into law, making it the second Republican-led state in as many days to adopt constitutional carry gun laws.

Governor McMaster’s Stance on Permitless Carry

Governor McMaster hailed the new legislation as a crucial step towards enhancing public safety and ensuring that law enforcement agencies possess the necessary tools to combat illegal gun use and possession by criminals. Speaking on the significance of the law, Governor McMaster emphasized its role in enabling law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges to keep career violent offenders behind bars, thereby safeguarding innocent South Carolinians from harm.

The NRA-Backed Bill: Key Provisions

winneconne-11-may-2018-nra-sticker

Backed by the National Rifle Association (NRA), the permitless carry bill allows eligible citizens aged 18 and older to carry a firearm in public without the need to obtain approval and a permit from the government. This legislation represents a significant departure from the previous regulatory framework, which required individuals to undergo a permitting process before carrying a firearm in public spaces.

Bolstering Public Safety

Proponents of permitless carry argue that it enhances public safety by empowering law-abiding citizens to exercise their inherent right to self-defense without bureaucratic impediments. By removing the requirement for a government-issued permit, permitless carry ensures that individuals can protect themselves and their loved ones promptly in critical situations.

Legislative Approval and Support

Ammunition-and-American-flag-on-US-Constitution-History-of-the-Second-Amendment

The bill garnered substantial support in both chambers of the South Carolina legislature, with the state Senate passing the legislation in a 28-18 vote and the state House approving it with a vote of 86-33. This bipartisan support underscores the broad consensus among lawmakers regarding the importance of upholding Second Amendment rights and promoting individual freedoms.

Addressing Concerns and Misconceptions

Critics of permitless carry have raised concerns regarding potential risks associated with expanded firearm access. However, proponents assert that responsible firearm ownership, coupled with stringent penalties for criminal misuse, mitigates these concerns and promotes a safer environment for all citizens.

South Carolina’s embrace of permitless carry represents a significant victory for proponents of Second Amendment rights and individual liberties. By enacting legislation that empowers law-abiding citizens to exercise their inherent right to bear arms, South Carolina reinforces its commitment to upholding the principles enshrined in the United States Constitution. As the national discourse on gun laws continues to evolve, the passage of permitless carry in South Carolina serves as a beacon of hope for those who champion individual freedoms and the preservation of constitutional rights.

Leave your thoughts about the victory of the Second Amendment in South Carolina in the comments below. 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Guncountry. All Rights Reserved