Connect with us


The NRA’s Blasts Gun Grabbers: Unveiling the Truth Behind the Statistics


In the wake of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week, where Yale School of Public Health Dean Megan Ranney suggested that Republican-controlled areas are more plagued by gun violence compared to Democratic-controlled cities like Chicago, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has delivered a robust and uncompromising response. The NRA’s spokesman, Billy McLaughlin, contends that Ranney’s assertions contribute to a broader narrative labeling firearm ownership as a “public health crisis” and reflects a coordinated effort by gun control extremists to dismantle Second Amendment rights.

McLaughlin dismisses the concept of firearm ownership as a public health crisis as an “old and tired” notion, arguing that it is a strategy employed by gun control advocates to erode constitutional rights. Ranney’s recent testimony, McLaughlin contends, exemplifies this tactic. Ranney, whom McLaughlin labels as a “known gun control extremist,” has affiliations with Moms Demand Action, a progressive grassroots group advocating for stricter gun control measures and the federal assault weapons ban.

The NRA spokesman emphasizes that Ranney’s advocacy for bans on commonly owned semi-automatic rifles since 2013 and consistent attacks on the NRA reflect a larger effort among activists to reshape the gun ownership debate, framing it as a public health issue rather than a matter of constitutional rights. This, McLaughlin argues, is a clear and intentional effort to undermine the Second Amendment.

The recent exchange between GOP Sen. John Kennedy and Ranney during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing has added fuel to the fire. Kennedy questioned Ranney about the high gun violence rates in Chicago, to which she responded by citing higher firearm death rates in states such as Mississippi, Louisiana, and Missouri. This comparison, however, drew criticism on social media, particularly from conservatives who pointed out that Chicago’s “gun homicide” rate is significantly higher than those states per 100,000 people.

McLaughlin, echoing the sentiments of many conservatives, argues that Ranney’s claim is misleading and relies on conflating data from different age groups to create what he calls an “alarmist narrative.” He suggests that this statistical manipulation is part of a broader strategy employed by gun control advocates to strengthen the case for restrictive gun control measures.

The NRA spokesman, in defense of the pro-gun stance, emphasizes that the goal is not to downplay the severity of gun violence but to ensure that the debate is grounded in accurate information and respects the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Ranney’s emphasis on factors like easy access to firearms, environmental conditions, and a lack of quality education as contributors to gun violence, McLaughlin argues, oversimplifies a complex issue and diverts attention from addressing the root causes.

To further underscore their point, McLaughlin references data, which reveals that Chicago’s gun homicide rate has consistently ranged from 25-29 murders per 100,000 people since 2019. In contrast, Louisiana, Missouri, and Mississippi saw rates of 12.5, 9.3, and 13 gun homicides per 100,000 people, respectively, during the same period. This stark difference challenges the narrative that Republican-controlled areas face a higher burden of gun violence.

Moreover, McLaughlin refers to a recent report from the Heritage Foundation, which contradicts the popular notion that gun violence is more prevalent in Republican-controlled areas. The report suggests that homicide rates have been consistently higher in Democrat-run “blue counties” than in “red counties” since 2002. This revelation challenges the assumptions of prominent liberals, including California Governor Gavin Newsom and billionaire George Soros, who have often cited a different narrative.

In conclusion, the NRA’s response to the claims made during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing sheds light on the complexities surrounding the gun violence debate. By dissecting statistics, challenging narratives, and emphasizing the constitutional rights at stake, the NRA aims to provide a nuanced perspective on an issue that has far-reaching implications for Americans’ rights and public safety. As the debate continues, the need for a balanced and fact-based discussion becomes increasingly imperative to ensure that policy decisions are grounded in reality rather than driven by political agendas.

What’s your favorite gun statistic that tells the real truth? What is your favorite lie gun grabbers use? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

(Visited 24 times, 1 visits today)


Federal Appeals Court Upholds California Laws Banning Gun Shows on Public Property


In a 3-0 decision, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld California laws that ban gun shows at county fairs and other public properties. This ruling overturned a previous decision by a federal judge in October that had blocked the enforcement of these laws.

The laws in question were introduced by Democratic State Senator Dave Min. The first law, which went into effect in January 2022, specifically prohibited gun shows at the Orange County Fair. The second law, effective last year, extended this ban to county fairgrounds on state-owned land throughout California.

Last year, U.S. District Judge Mark Holcomb ruled that these laws violated the rights of gun sellers and potential buyers. He argued that preventing the purchase of firearms at these events infringed upon commercial speech protected by the First Amendment, as lawful gun sales involve such speech.

However, the appeals court took a different view, stating that the laws do not violate the First Amendment. Judge Richard Clifton wrote that the bans simply prohibit sales agreements on public property and do not limit discussions, advertisements, or other speech related to firearms. Clifton noted that a separate, unchallenged state law mandates that the actual purchase of a firearm at a gun show be completed at a licensed gun store, following a 10-day waiting period and a background check.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta praised the ruling, calling it a victory in the fight against gun violence. Bonta emphasized that firearms should not be sold on state-owned property and lauded the decision as a step towards greater public safety.

Gun-control advocates argue that gun shows can make firearms more attractive to children and facilitate “straw purchases,” where individuals buy guns for those who are legally prohibited from owning them.

The case originated from a lawsuit by B&L Productions, a gun show company, which claimed that the ban on fairgrounds sales infringed upon the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The appeals court countered this claim, pointing out that there were six licensed firearms dealers in the same ZIP code as the Orange County Fairgrounds, indicating that the law did not restrict access to firearms.

Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle & Pistol Association and attorney for the plaintiffs, expressed intent to appeal the ruling. Michel criticized the decision, asserting that it discriminates against gun culture and infringes on fundamental rights.

As this legal battle continues, the tension between gun rights advocates and those pushing for stricter gun control measures remains high. This case highlights the ongoing debate over how best to balance public safety concerns with constitutional rights in the United States.

What do you think of the recent appeals court hearing?

Continue Reading


National African American Gun Association (NAAGA) Unveils 2024

Dallas, TX – The National African American Gun Association (NAAGA) is thrilled to announce the 2024
National Summit, a dynamic four-day event dedicated to fostering growth within the 2A community. The
summit is scheduled to take place from July 25th to July 28th and will be hosted at the Dallas/Addison
Marriott Quorum by Galleria in Dallas, TX.

This annual gathering marks NAAGA’s celebration of its 9th anniversary, continuing the organization’s
commitment to the rich tradition of arms in the African American community. NAAGA aims to expose,
educate, and motivate African American men, women, and youth to exercise their 2nd Amendment
rights responsibly.
Exciting Features of the 2024 National Summit:

  • Luxurious Venue: The summit will unfold at the recently renovated Dallas/Addison Marriott Quorum
    by Galleria, providing attendees with a sophisticated and comfortable setting.
  • Diverse Programming: With over 50 breakout sessions, attendees can delve into topics such as the
    history of arms in the African American community, youth and gun safety, women in the firearms
    community, political action, situational awareness, personal defense methods, and a dedicated session
    for African American firearms instructors.
  • Entertaining Events: The summit will feature a range of events, including the Sneaker Ball – a night of
    fashion, awards, and dancing; the Queen of Defense Breakfast – an interactive event for women only;
    Family Night at the Black Invitational Rodeo and Bullets and BBQ – a day at the range filled with training,
    fun, food and friendly competition; a social mixer, open range time, hourly gun giveaways, and
    opportunities to explore products from top manufacturers at the Vendors and Exhibits area.
  • Community Engagement: Attendees can connect with thousands of African American gun owners and
    supporters from across the country, fostering education, training, and fellowship.

NAAGA invites all individuals passionate about 2nd Amendment rights, safety, and responsible

firearms ownership to participate in this enriching event. For ticket information and registration, please visit For media inquiries, please email

About the National African American Gun Association (NAAGA)
Founded in 2015, NAAGA stands as a unique brotherhood and sisterhood in the firearms industry. The
organization is dedicated to educating and training the African American community on the rich legacy
of gun ownership, offering support, safety standards, and cultural inspiration.

Source link: by AmSJ Staff at

Continue Reading


New Hampshire House Passes Pro-Gun Bill Protecting Firearm Purchasers’ Privacy


On Thursday, May 30th, the New Hampshire House of Representatives made a significant move in favor of gun rights by passing House Bill 1186, an act designed to protect the privacy of firearm purchasers. The bill now awaits Governor Chris Sununu’s signature, and supporters of the Second Amendment are encouraged to contact the Governor to advocate for this crucial legislation.

Key Provisions of House Bill 1186

House Bill 1186 specifically prohibits the use of a unique merchant category code for transactions involving firearms, ammunition, or firearm accessories. This measure is designed to protect the privacy of gun owners by preventing the tracking of gun-related purchases through credit and debit card transactions. The bill also includes a provision for civil penalties for any violations, ensuring that individuals and businesses comply with the new law.

Protecting Gun Owners’ Privacy

If signed into law, HB 1186 will be a vital safeguard for gun owners in New Hampshire. By preventing the creation of a specific merchant category code for firearm-related purchases, the bill ensures that transactions cannot be easily tracked or used to compile a gun registry. This protection is essential in preventing bad actors from using financial data to interfere with lawful gun ownership.

The Importance of HB 1186

The passage of HB 1186 represents a significant victory for gun rights advocates and a reaffirmation of the Second Amendment. The bill addresses a growing concern among gun owners that their purchases could be monitored or restricted through financial institutions. By safeguarding the privacy of these transactions, New Hampshire is taking a strong stance in protecting the rights of its citizens.

The NRA and its members are urging Governor Chris Sununu to sign HB 1186 into law. Supporters of the Second Amendment and gun rights advocates should contact the Governor’s office to express their support for this critical legislation. Prime sponsor Rep. Jason Janvrin (R-Rockingham) and other lawmakers who backed the bill deserve recognition for their efforts to uphold the privacy and rights of Granite Staters.

House Bill 1186 is a crucial piece of legislation that protects the privacy of firearm purchasers and upholds the rights of gun owners in New Hampshire. By preventing the use of specific merchant category codes for gun-related transactions, the bill ensures that financial data cannot be used to create a gun registry or restrict lawful purchases. Governor Chris Sununu’s signature on this bill will be a significant step forward in defending the Second Amendment and protecting the privacy of gun owners.

Contact Governor Chris Sununu today and urge him to sign House Bill 1186 into law. Your voice is essential in ensuring that this critical legislation becomes law and continues to protect the privacy and rights of all gun owners in New Hampshire.

Contact Information for Governor Chris Sununu:

Phone: (603) 271-2121


Make sure to express your support for HB 1186 and emphasize the importance of protecting the privacy and rights of gun owners.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2024 Guncountry. All Rights Reserved