Connect with us


You Must Train Beyond The Range If You Want To Survive A Real-Life Gunfight


For new gun owners eager to refine their shooting skills, it’s necessary to get some training outside of the range. The good news is that this isn’t just a necessity, it involves a lot of fun and exciting ways to train for a real-life gunfight. 

The truth is that most of the best ways to prepare for a real-life gunfight, including drawing, shooting from unusual and awkward positions, and using your weapon against a motivated and engaged attacker aren’t just forbidden at the range, they’re also dangerous. However, in the comfort of your own home, with an unloaded firearm, they’re exactly what you need to protect yourself and your family in a real-life gunfight. 

Why You Need To Dry-Fire Train

So dry-fire training is basically when you use an unloaded firearm in the same way that you would a loaded one, with the obvious difference that you’re not actually sending rounds down range. That might sound like an exercise in futility, but many of the top competitive shooters in the world swear by dry-fire training, often doing it significantly more than live-fire training. 

This allows you to train in weird positions, train while drawing, and train to fight to get to your weapon, all skills that will likely come in handy in the event that you ever have to actually use your weapon in a self-defense scenario. Obviously, you can’t do most of these at the range because they’re not allowed and they’re certainly not safe with a loaded firearm. 

Alternatives To Dry Fire Training

You don’t just have to use an unloaded weapon. You can also use an Airsoft pistol or a SIRT air pistol to introduce an element of realism into your training. From your perspective, a SIRT air pistol provides something like recoil and also allows you to know how accurate your shots are from unusual and awkward positions or while being engaged in direct force-on-force attacks from a training partner. 

Similarly, an Airsoft pistol can introduce some stakes into force-on-force training with a partner. Your partner doesn’t want to get hit at point-blank range with an Airsoft pellet, so they’re likely going to give you a harder time getting to your pistol, much as a real-life attacker will not want to get shot and will be willing to do just about anything to keep you from getting to your weapon. 

Your Home Range Playground

Most people can’t just start shooting off rounds in their backyard. In addition to local laws, it’s probably not safe. Dry-fire training, however, fixes this, allowing you to turn your own backyard into a range playground. You can set up obstacle courses, moving targets, and false targets, allowing you to learn how to shoot on the move, pick targets quickly in a time crunch, and shoot from strange and unusual positions. 

There are even targets you can but specifically for this purpose. Some of these have different-sized targets on the same object, which allows you to get some long-distance shooting training going without having access to a long-distance range. 

Stress Training

Dry-fire training at home also allows you to introduce stress training into your routine. This is absolutely necessary because when you’re in a real-life firefight to say that you’re going to be stressed out is an understatement. The good news is that you can start training for that stress starting today. 

It might sound silly, but things like having loud, unpleasant noises or even just standing on one leg are excellent preparation for a real-life firefight for the simple reason that it’s going to make you stressed out. Your body doesn’t know the difference between different kinds of stress, only different levels of stress. So doing things that make shooting more stressful right now can help to prepare you to defend your own life and that of your family in a real-life firefight. 

The point is that the range is great but it’s simply not enough to get you ready for a real-life firefight. So start figuring out outside-of-the-box ways to train with your (preferably unloaded) weapon if you want to be truly ready for a real-life gunfight.

How are you training outside of the range? What do you do at the range to be more ready for a real-life firefight? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

(Visited 37 times, 1 visits today)
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Biden’s Newest Attempt to Take Your Guns


The Biden administration finalized a new rule last week, touted by Attorney General Merrick Garland as a “historic step” in combating gun violence. This rule aims to increase background checks on gun sales by broadening the pool of people required to obtain a federal firearms license (FFL). The administration claims this will address the so-called “gun show loophole” and reduce illegal gun sales.

According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), there’s a “large and growing black market of guns being sold by people without a license.” They argue that this black market is fueling violence because these sellers are not conducting background checks. However, many see this new rule as yet another attempt to infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.

Understanding the New Rule

To grasp the impact of this new rule, it’s crucial to understand the existing laws governing gun sales. Federal law mandates that all gun dealers conduct background checks via the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) before selling a firearm. However, private sales between individuals who are not in the business of selling guns do not require background checks.

Currently, 20 states have implemented their own laws to require background checks for all gun sales, including private transactions. In the remaining 30 states, private sales can occur without a background check as long as the seller is not engaged in the business of selling firearms.

The new rule seeks to limit the number of legal private sales by expanding the definition of who is considered a “gun dealer.” Previously, a person needed an FFL if they were involved in the “repetitive” buying and selling of firearms with the primary objective of “livelihood and profit.” The new rule changes this to require a license if the goal is to “predominantly earn a profit,” regardless of whether the seller relies on this activity for their livelihood.

Debunking Myths and Clarifying Facts

Myth #1: The New Rule Closes the “Gun Show Loophole”

Despite claims from the White House and mainstream media, there has never been a “gun show loophole.” Gun shows operate under the same legal framework as other venues: dealers must conduct background checks, while private sellers are not required to do so. The new rule does not close any loophole; it simply creates more confusion and potentially drives private sellers away from gun shows, where they are easier for law enforcement to monitor.

Myth #2: The New Rule Provides Clarity

The rule is marketed as providing clarity, yet it is anything but clear. The ATF’s 19-page FAQ document only adds to the confusion. It states that to “predominantly earn a profit” means the primary intent of the sale is financial gain, as opposed to personal reasons like upgrading a collection. However, there is no clear threshold for what constitutes “repetitive” sales or what amount of profit triggers the need for an FFL.

The lack of concrete standards means law-abiding citizens are left in a legal gray area. The rule could easily be interpreted in a way that criminalizes ordinary gun owners who occasionally sell firearms.

Myth #3: The New Rule Is a Major Change

Both proponents and critics of the rule suggest it will have significant impacts, but this may be overstated. The ATF has long maintained that even a single transaction can require a license under certain conditions. The real effect of the new rule is to sow uncertainty among private sellers, potentially discouraging lawful sales and undermining the Second Amendment.

The Real Impact on Gun Owners

The Biden administration’s new rule will likely deter lawful gun owners from selling firearms due to fear of legal repercussions. This does little to address the criminal misuse of firearms and instead burdens responsible citizens. The rule could particularly impact hunters and sports shooters who want to sell old guns to upgrade their equipment.

By creating more obstacles for law-abiding gun owners, the administration risks driving gun sales further underground, making it harder for law enforcement to track illegal activities. The people most affected will not be the high-volume sellers the ATF claims to target but ordinary Americans who cherish their Second Amendment rights.

The new rule from the Biden administration is another step towards greater government control over private gun ownership. It doesn’t close any loopholes or provide meaningful clarity. Instead, it creates a chilling effect on lawful gun sales, turning responsible citizens into potential criminals.

As with many gun control measures, this rule places undue burdens on the law-abiding while doing little to address actual crime. It’s a reminder that vigilance is necessary to protect our constitutional rights from overreach by those who seek to undermine the Second Amendment. Now more than ever, it’s crucial to stand firm against any attempts to erode our fundamental freedoms.

What do you think of the Biden Regime’s latest attempt to take your guns? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Continue Reading


Did the ATF Just Turn You Into an Unlicensed Gun Dealer?


Amidst the world of firearms and gun ownership, scenarios arise where individuals find themselves downsizing their collections or navigating the complexities of buying and selling firearms. For some, it may involve parting ways with budget guns to fund the acquisition of their dream firearm, while for others, it could entail managing the estate of a deceased family member who left behind a substantial gun collection.

However, recent regulatory changes by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) have introduced new considerations and challenges. With the implementation of ATF Rule 2022R-17, the definition of who qualifies as a firearm dealer has been broadened, potentially impacting individuals engaged in occasional sales or private transactions.

Under the revised regulations, the criteria for determining whether someone is “engaged in the business” as a dealer in firearms have been expanded. This includes factors such as the intention to “predominantly earn a profit” from firearm sales, regardless of the medium or method used for transactions. Additionally, the definition of “dealer” now encompasses individuals conducting firearm transactions through various channels, including online platforms and gun shows.

Despite these changes, the regulations provide clarity on exemptions for individuals selling firearms as part of a personal collection or hobby, as long as sales remain occasional and not primarily for profit. However, navigating these distinctions requires careful attention to detail and adherence to legal requirements to avoid unintentionally falling afoul of the law.

The implications of ATF Rule 2022R-17 extend beyond mere technicalities, potentially impacting the everyday activities of gun owners and enthusiasts. From selling off surplus firearms to acquiring new additions to their collections, individuals must now navigate a regulatory landscape that demands heightened awareness and compliance.

Moreover, the rule underscores broader concerns about government overreach and the erosion of Second Amendment rights. By redefining existing regulations without legislative scrutiny, the ATF’s actions raise questions about transparency and accountability in firearms policy-making.

In light of these developments, individuals involved in firearm transactions must stay informed and adapt to evolving regulatory frameworks. Whether buying, selling, or transferring firearms, adherence to legal requirements and diligent record-keeping is paramount to avoid unintended legal consequences.

Ultimately, as gun owners and enthusiasts navigate the changing landscape of firearms regulation, vigilance and advocacy for Second Amendment rights remain crucial. By staying informed, engaging in responsible firearm ownership practices, and advocating for sensible policy reforms, individuals can uphold their rights while ensuring compliance with legal requirements.

Are you concerned about being on the wrong side of the ATF? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Continue Reading


What’s the Difference Between 5.56 NATO and .223 Remington


For novice gun owners and seasoned enthusiasts alike, understanding the nuances between various ammunition types is crucial for ensuring optimal performance and safety of firearms. One common area of confusion arises when comparing the 5.56 NATO and .223 Remington cartridges, as their differences, though seemingly small, can have a significant impact on weapon function and safety.

The primary difference between the two cartridges lies in their pressure levels. The 5.56 NATO cartridge operates at approximately 58,000 pounds per square inch (psi), whereas the .223 Remington is loaded to around 55,000 psi. While this disparity may appear minor, it plays a critical role in the overall performance of the ammunition.

However, the most important distinction between the two cartridges lies in the chamber dimensions. A 5.56 NATO chamber features a .125-inch longer throat compared to a .223 Remington chamber. This additional space allows for the loading of approximately one more grain of powder in the 5.56 NATO cartridge, resulting in higher performance levels compared to its .223 Remington counterpart.

The potential danger arises when firing a 5.56 NATO cartridge in a rifle chambered for .223 Remington. Due to the longer throat of the NATO chamber, this combination can lead to significantly increased pressure levels, reaching upwards of 65,000 psi or more. Such high pressures pose a severe risk to both the operator and the firearm, potentially causing primers to back out or even resulting in catastrophic failure.

Conversely, firing a .223 Remington cartridge in a 5.56 NATO chambered rifle may lead to suboptimal performance. The lower pressure generated by the .223 Remington cartridge, coupled with the dimensions of the NATO chamber, can result in improper cycling of the firearm, particularly in rifles with barrels shorter than 14.5 inches. While rifles with longer barrels may mitigate some of these issues, it is essential for gun owners to exercise caution when selecting ammunition for their firearms.

In conclusion, while the differences between the 5.56 NATO and .223 Remington cartridges may seem subtle, they can have profound implications for weapon function, safety, and performance. Gun owners must educate themselves on these distinctions to make informed decisions when selecting ammunition and avoid potentially dangerous situations.

Do you want to weigh in on this debate? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2024 Guncountry. All Rights Reserved